20 Comments
User's avatar
PamelaDrew's avatar

Awesome series.. can't wait for the world to learn Bret's dad is Kingpin of antibody patents so Bret has buried truth about mRNA TRANSFECTION as decades old bench tool for ALL virology rebranded as "investigational vaccines" for IP cash cow & criminal malpractice on par w lobotomy.

Expand full comment
Ned's avatar

That was quick Pamela!

I can't abide him, regardless of the accuracy of the science, that day he donned the bandana & goggles, I just thought, twerp!

I've noted the background of the parents, in relation to RFK Jr. too etc, but have stuck to the visual basics: just look at this twit!

He talks gobbledygook. Thick as a brick, is exactly what came to mind. I have a BA (Hons) architecture, so have some notion of academic procedure.

Bret? Ph.D my arse.

If you can, inform Dr. Couey my intentions are honourable. I hope he talks to one-legged Alex; just to help spread the covid1984 story of the harmed and bereaved.

Expand full comment
PamelaDrew's avatar

Hah, some days you get peanuts some days you get shells.. mileage varies but sharing in Ohmie realms w fingers crossed which is always my biggest job! :~)

There is no science to be learned from the pompous dipstick.. attitude alone gives me a big time cramp.. worse than MoMA cocktail party that will at least add fab finger food to insipid babble of entitled class steeped in brilliance & certainty that's undoubtedly the best money can buy. *smirk*

Expand full comment
Ned's avatar

'pompous dipstick'

Both of them. Mr. & Mrs. Pompous Dipstein.

Expand full comment
Derek Curtis's avatar

Hindsight can make us all so ridiculous, when you saw people take a test they had never heard of, to diagnosis a 'thing' they had never heard of, and this 'thing' could have no symptoms.

It beggars belief doesn't it ?

Expand full comment
Ned's avatar

In this case, I was sighted at the time. Whether gut feeling or general distrust of the official narrative in many things, I did not engage any of it. I did pull a woollen neck warmer up over my mouth a few times in shops after my bank called the police because I refused to don a face nappy. I wanted to avoid aggro; I was concerned at my own temper. I just could not believe how easily everyone fell into line. It was like being in an episode of Dr. Who.

Then I bought some exemption lanyards.

I had a household of unjabbed family and it was getting pretty serious at one stage. I wondered if the authorities would go house to house. To see Bret the Ph.D like that was surreal. I thought he must be joking at first. No, he is just dumb. I want all from UK PM Boris to Hancock to Whitty to Vallance to Van Dam et al held to account. I have not forgotten.

Yes, it beggared belief. It changed my life's perspective about friends and neighbours.

Exactly what is all was, I am curious to know and Dr. Couey is giving as useful insights as anyone.

Expand full comment
Dr Rosemary Faire's avatar

Oh Ned, so good to have discovered your creative output! I'm embarrassed to say I fell for the pandemonium BS in 2020 and even bought a sewing machine so that I could make my bearded spouse a "proper" mask that went around his beard LOL. I love your repurposing of your artistic talent toward adding a touch of humour to an otherwise bleak situation.

Expand full comment
Ned's avatar

A sewing machined mask was pretty hardcore.

Keep in mind Dr. Couey was still jabbing his kids until recent years; he admits his regret today. I've been anti-jabs for years; I've had a healthy scepticism for years without fully understanding why.

Expand full comment
Dr Rosemary Faire's avatar

True confessions now: I was also a climate activist until the pandemonium woke me up: I discovered that the same guy who taught me how to "debunk climate deniers" moved seamlessly into "prebunking misinformation about the vaccines" - that's when the penny dropped, as I knew more about the latter, having been a biologist in my former life. I never had kids so never really had to look into the issue of jab/no jab until 2021. I felt for Dr Jay as he watched Brandy's lecture the other day and realised he should have done known better. :(

Expand full comment
Ned's avatar

I'm art-working & listening to that right now.

I remember her from the time she went 'rogue'. It's funny watching Dr. Couey catch up with material I've seen.

I read David Icke's The Biggest Secret c.2005 while exhibiting in Bodrum, Turkiye, so when covid1984 hit, I was well 'trained' to be suspicious. I remember David Icke presenting BBC Grandstand sports programme. I remember his Wogan Show calamity. Today the likes of Dr. Couey compare Icke to Alex Jones. I've been 'conspiracy' interested for years. I first saw Ryan Dawson on Icke's website. Today Icke won't feature him. Dawson can teach Couey on 9/11. Couey can teach Dawson on biology.

It's a funny old game, the 'truth'. It's liberating letting fear go whether viruses or climate etc.

Expand full comment
Bob - Enough's avatar

If you have neighbours, family or friends that wore, even wear, or will wear a face nappy; a few little tricks for you to convince them that they were- stupid people and the protection against their believed virus, was/ is utter tosh / useless and a load of bllx.

====> ... a) for me it was easy as a smoker and especially against the adamant non-smokers... literally light up a cigarette, and when you exhale - blow the smoke at them; even at 6 yards, they will smell it .... b) Have a curry the night before you meet and fart quietly remaining polite of course !! ... c) If they visit you in your home, turn down the heating so much, you have ice forming on windows and walls - take idiot guest to a mirror and ask why steam from his / her breath is coming out of his face nappy ?....

Oh aye, you can also ask why the "virus" travelled the World and became a pandemic in a few days or weeks, from China -> Europe and the US etc, but err - standing 6 yards from each other or being in lockdown in our little towns SAVED OUR LIVES.

In hindsight, everyone that fell for the above nonsense and the got the jab (up to 6 boosters now I think in the UK) are ruddy ignorant brainwashed fools. Rant over.

Expand full comment
Ned's avatar

Good tips.

If I ever bothered, I've long given up convincing or persuading.

Simply from life experience I noted that at school or work or wherever, some caught 'the bug' going round and some didn't. Wearing PPE, an utter waste of money, probably encourages discomfort and ill-health.

Expand full comment
Original Owner's avatar

He doesn't bug me, and he and Heying do seem (to me) to show their work. If he bugs you, the solution seems obvious, no?

Expand full comment
Ned's avatar

Solution to what? No, it's not obvious. But, you obviously felt the need to comment.

Have I said he bugs me?

I think he's a twerp; and as thick as a brick; both of them.

You can appreciate both as you wish. Go ahead. Did you wear a face nappy too?

Expand full comment
Tony's avatar

Can he show why he continues to call them anything but TRANSFECTIONS (even though he has known since at least 2021). The dude is an utter fraud who has grievously mislead the young- unforgivable.

Expand full comment
Ned's avatar

What is a 'vaccine' distinct from a transfection?

Both are needles.

Both are fluids.

I haven't had an injection since last century.

Expand full comment
Tony's avatar

True. But unfortunatey we’ve a long way to go to convince the masses that all intramuscular injection of any combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb. The mythology is centuries ingrained into our culture.

Transfection however is a decades old standard lab bench technology for putting proteins where they are not meant to be. Should be a slam dunk NO NO from the very start if you are a scientist with two brain cells to rub together.

Expand full comment
Ned's avatar

OK, 'Transfection is a decades old standard lab bench technology for putting proteins where they are not meant to be.'

But, what is a vaccine supposed to be? I understand it is supposed to put a little sample of a given disease into a human with a view to stimulating anti-bodies to that disease, no?

I realise I risk appearing 'dumb', but I'm trying to understand the difference. Or is it, vaxxes have always been transfections and have always been dumb? Whatever they are, I don't want them, but I want to understand the distinct differences.

Expand full comment
Tony's avatar

You’re not dumb at all. I’m not a great teacher but I’ll try and make it simple. Basically they are completely different. The only thing they share in common is delivery by syringe.

Vaccines are manufactured and predosed.

Transfection instructs your body’s own cells (self) to make the foreign antigen (non self, causing autoimmunity). Your body is the final assembly plant…antigen dose and ‘quality’ is unknown and the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery vehicle can end up all over the body.

Both processes are dogshit if you prefer to live a long, healthy life.

Expand full comment
Ned's avatar

This is an important difference and distinction; I'd like to 'draw' it.

The 'predose' triggers a signal to the body to produce 'antibodies'. Exactly what is an antibody I ask myself. Is this 'antibody' triggering the production of more antibody?

The transfection fluid sends a signal for the body to produce 'antibodies' independently of providing 'antibody'?

I doubt many people understand. I'm still struggling. I've copied and saved your answer. I did some biology at school. I do know plants breathe in CO2, breather out O2, we breathe in O2 and breathe out CO2....

I'll do some further reading till I have my head round it.

Expand full comment