Genos : Tribe, Race, Nation. Cide : Killing

I repeat posting this video from my Substack yesterday. It's so deranged, unhinged, bizarre, crackers, mind boggling.... and all the while the world sees what Norman sees: unequivocal genocide.

Whatever, however you wish to term mass murder, Zionist Israel is slaughtering Palestinians and apparently intent on ridding itself of Palestine. I suspect they will ultimately fail, but in the mean time thousands are being murdered, injured and displaced while the collective West argue about defining genocide and the parameters of a ceasefire.

You have to watch this to believe it. Rabbi Shmuley is apparently a buddy of RFK Jr.’s.

Rabbi Shmuley makes allegation upon allegation I understand to be false. Journalists have dismantled much of Shmuley’s assertions.
You could try e.g. https://thegrayzone.com/, but of course, the Shmuley camp will dismiss platforms such as the Grayzone as antisemitic propaganda. I sense the power of the slur antisemitism has lost its venom; like homophobic or sexist or transphobic or any number of accusative labels so easily thrown around in recent decades, these divide and rule cultural Marxists weaponised words no longer hold the threat they once did.

Genocide
https://www.britannica.com/topic/genocide
Genocide, the deliberate and systematic destruction of a group of people because of their ethnicity, nationality, religion, or race. The term, derived from the Greek genos (“race,” “tribe,” or “nation”) and the Latin cide (“killing”), was coined by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-born jurist who served as an adviser to the U.S. Department of War during World War II.

The ‘Inventor’ Of The Term Genocide, Raphael Lemkin
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/coining-a-word-and-championing-a-cause-the-story-of-raphael-lemkin
Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-Jewish jurist, was born in 1900 on a small farm near the Polish town of Wolkowysk.

From childhood, Lemkin was fascinated with the history of religious and ethnic persecution. He was also keenly aware of antisemitic pogroms. Then, as a law student in his twenties, Lemkin learned about the Ottoman destruction of the Armenians during World War I (known today as the Armenian Genocide). His outrage about historical and contemporary events of group-targeted mass violence inspired his belief that there should be an international law against the destruction of groups.

He later served with the team of Americans working to prepare the Nuremberg trials, where he was able to get the word “genocide” included in the indictment against Nazi leadership….

Let’s remember, Germans were tortured during the Nuremberg trials. Shmuley refers to lampshades, which was long ago dismissed as part of a fabricated scenario along with soap and shrunken heads. This is all ddocumented here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4nAUJSV5HTXe/

To really put the cat among the pigeons, I reference another alleged ‘genocide’ and a passage from Nutuk with reference to the Armenian ‘genocide’.

I quote from Nutuk:
“In international relations it must be the ardent wish of the whole civilised world to put an end to the time when the system of puppets governs policy.”

From Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s
Nutuk : Great Speech
15-20 Oct 1927 Eng version p.573

From Ataturk’s Nutuk 36 hour speech given 15-20 October 1927, there are passages relevant to the alleged Armenian ‘genocide’.

I’m writing out as per the book and as the English translation is written. Of course, being these are the words of Atatürk, they risk the accusation of bias. My view is Atatürk’s account is worthy of consideration. We were not there and can only examine the apparent evidence.

Atatürk represented a National Assembly based out of Ankara. The established ‘Government’ represented the remnants of the Caliphate and Sultanate powers based in Istanbul. The ‘Government’ were considering compromise and appeasement with foreign forces while the National Assembly sought complete national independence.

p.318
“Gentleman! A communication from Istanbul on 19 February 1920 brought us the news that:
“The English diplomatic representative has verbally given definite information to the Government from the Foreign Office that the capital will be left to the Ottoman Empire, but at the same time, he has demanded that the Armenian massacres shall cease forthwith and that our operations against the Allied troops – including those of Greece – shall also cease immediately. He added if this were not done, our peace conditions would be altered…

p.319
Finally, did the Allied Powers entertain some doubt about the Government not succeeding in disbanding troops at the front which the national forces had sent into the occupied districts to oppose the forces of the enemy and put an end to the fight they carried on and the movement they made against them, and did they consequently plan to occupy Istanbul on the pretext that the Government could neither prevent the attacks against the Allied Powers (including the Greeks) nor put an end to the Armenian massacres – which, by the way, did not exist?

I believe that later events have shown that the last of these suggestions was the nearest of all to the truth. It was, however, noticeable that the Government, far from interpreting the proposal made by the English diplomatic representative in this light, had, on the contrary, founded their hopes on it.

Gentleman! In order to understand how ill-advised this proposal was, we shall recall certain phases of the situation as they presented themselves at the time. The assertions regarding the Armenians massacres were undoubtedly not in accordance with fact. For the Armenians in the south, armed by foreign troops and encouraged by the protection they enjoyed, attacked the Muslims of their district.

p.320
Animated by the spirit of revenge, they pursued a relentless policy of murder and extermination everywhere. This was responsible for the tragic incident at Maras (Ned note: sounds like Marash). Making common cause with the foreign troops, the Armenians had completely destroyed an old Muslim town like Maras by their artillery and machine-gun fire.

They killed thousands of innocent and defenceless women and children. The Armenians were the instigators of the atrocities, which were unique in history. The Muslims had merely offered resistance and had defended themselves with the object of saving their lives and their honour. The telegram which the Americans, who had remained in the town with the Muslims during the five days that the massacres continued, had sent to their representatives in Istanbul, clearly indicates in an indisputable manner who were the originators of this tragedy.

Threatened by the bayonets of the Armenians, who were armed to the teeth, the Muslims in the Vilayet of Adana were at that time in danger of being annihilated. While this policy of oppression and annihilation carried on against the Muslims, who were only trying to save their lives and their independence, was liable to attract the attention of the civilised world and excite their commiseration, how could the denials or the proposal made to us to abandon the attitude attributed to us be taken seriously?”

The truth? It’s apparently both allusive, but we must be free to ask and discuss. It seems the official narrative status quo is crumbling just as the Ottoman Empire did. As we know, Christopher Columbus discovered America – didn’t he? Any comment Piri Reis?! The Vikings? A myriad of other possibilities?

To further put cats among pigeons…
Genocide of Truth By Sukru Server Aya – Part 1
https://nationofturks.com/genocide-of-truth-by-sukru-server-aya-part-1/

As a wag once said,
‘The artist must go very far, so that the ordinary man will go far enough. Arsenal!’

Yurtta Barış Dünyada Barış : Peace At Home, Peace İn The World… if only.

Previous:
https://nedpamphilon.substack.com/p/david-irving